Iran Watch: My best advice in a manic market

Peter Mullin • March 4, 2026

My best advice a manic market

By Peter Mullin, CEO/Financial Consultant 



Clients, we have never been in it for last year's results. Instead, we are betting on future prospects. 

We know life is not perfect. But over time, it will be okay. 


There are life lessons we can draw on from investing.

One lesson involves taking bad periods with a grain of salt. Uncertainty is the price we pay for an investment’s potential rewards. 

Iran is striking back at the Middle East and allies like a multi-headed medusa. This did just occur in June of 2025. The difference is there is a presumed push for a regime change. 


It is a nail biting time, once again. My best advice is to keep the long view in mind during times that test our wits. 


But there is war. There is hyperinflation. This market is out of control. I can't lose anymore…I won’t live long enough to recover.


How long has it taken a market to bounce back? 


Surprisingly, markets bounce back quite quickly from the real terror of missiles, mortars and military strikes. JP Morgan’s chart shows that it takes 2-3 weeks (or less) on average. The average drawdown is about -5.3%. 



Our worries at this moment are all bricks to add to the wall of worry we all face as investors. We lose when we jump out of our long-term strategy. And know that an investor that abandon’s ship will always reassure themselves that they can always get back in.  


Keep your seatbelts fastened. And please stop looking at your daily portfolio balance…


We face this wall of worry together. I am here if you are wondering if you are doing Okay.


Carry on!


Peter Mullin, AAMS®



 ---------------------------




All performance referenced is historical and is no guarantee of future results.

The S&P 500 is an unmanaged index which cannot be invested into directly. Unmanaged index returns do not reflect fees, expenses or sales charges. Index performance is not indicative of the performance of any investment. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

This material is for general information only and is not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual. There is no assurance that the views or strategies discussed are suitable for all investors or will yield positive outcomes. 

Investing involves risks including possible loss of principal. 

References to markets, asset classes, and sectors are generally regarding the corresponding market index. Indexes are unmanaged statistical composites and cannot be invested into directly. 

Index performance is not indicative of the performance of any investment and do not reflect fees, expenses, or sales charges. 



Securities and Advisory services offered through LPL Financial, A Registered Investment Advisor, Member FINRA/SIPC.


Find Time with Peter

 

  • Mullin's take on the "4% Retirement Rule"
  • Navigate "Bad Portfolio Weather"
  • Tips to Optimize Social Security 

 

Start Reading your 44-page EBook Sample >>

Assessing Market Impacts of Iran Airstrikes

March 3, 2026
This week on LPL Market Signals, Chief Equity Strategist Jeff Buchbinder and Chief Fixed Income Strategist Lawrence Gillum, discuss potential stock and bond market impacts of the airstrikes on Iran over the weekend. Tracking: #1072379

Assessing the Impact of Developments in Iran: Watch Energy

March 3, 2026
Kristian Kerr | Head of Macro Strategy Last Updated: March 02, 2026 Over the weekend, the United States and Israel conducted a coordinated series of missile and drone strikes against Iran, targeting several high-value military installations in an effort to hinder Iran’s nuclear development efforts. These operations resulted in the death of Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, marking a significant escalation and immediately heightening regional tensions. Iran quickly retaliated by launching a broad series of missile attacks directed not only at Israel but also at multiple Gulf states, including Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, and Bahrain. The repercussions were felt across the region. Several Gulf countries responded by shutting down their airspace and closing their equity markets. The conflict also affected global energy flows. Tanker traffic through the Strait of Hormuz, a vital waterway that carries about 20% of the world’s oil supply, came to a near standstill as shipping companies diverted vessels away from the area for safety reasons. Plus, Qatar shuttered liquefied natural gas production at the world’s largest export facility after being targeted by an Iranian drone strike. President Donald Trump stated that U.S. strikes on Iran would continue, signaling that tensions are likely to remain elevated for the next few weeks. From a market perspective, the energy market is the primary way through which this crisis is likely to impact global markets. Any sustained disruption to oil or natural gas flows, especially if both severe and long lasting, have the potential to influence inflation expectations, weigh on business confidence, and elevate volatility across asset classes. In simple terms, the more intense and prolonged the geopolitical shock, the larger the likely market impact. This pattern was already evident when markets opened on Monday. Brent crude, the global benchmark for oil prices, briefly touched $82 per barrel as traders responded to the possibility of tighter supply conditions. A sustained period of elevated prices would place upward pressure on inflation expectations, and that in turn could have broader consequences for both equity and interest rate markets. However, for such a persistent rise in crude prices to materialize, markets would likely need evidence of a more prolonged or even total shutdown of the Strait of Hormuz. A disruption of that scale would represent a meaningful escalation relative to what has occurred so far and would justify a more substantial risk premium in energy markets. There is also a political dimension tied to Iran’s internal stability, particularly regarding how the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) chooses to respond. Whether it opts to pull back or escalate further will play a major role in determining how much of the current shock reflects elevated risk premiums versus a true disruption to physical supply.  Oil Prices Spike as Strait of Hormuz Tanker Traffic Stalls

Charting the markets: The great divide

February 18, 2026
LPL Market Signals

What is Your Wealth Story?

By Peter Mullin • January 20, 2026
My values and mission

Quarterly Market Insight - Q4 2025

January 16, 2026

One more speed bump before year-end?

By Peter Mullin • November 11, 2025
“Optimism sounds like a sales pitch. Pessimism sounds like someone trying to help you .” Morgan Housel, The Psychology of Money I do believe parts of the stock market are due for a reality check. But our big-picture, combined with our investment process says to hang in there. Connect with us now, especially if anything has changed for you. Remember April and Tariff Tantrums? Portfolio risk still matters Does is feel like stocks have done better than they actually have this year? Last year was a bumper year. And this year many have likely already forgotten the sharp April tariff tantrums. In recent history, market reality checks have been brief. For example, COVID caused stock markets to drop aggressively, followed by a wild recovery. Then 2022 reminded investors that taking imprudent risk can burn you. This rapid cycle of loss and recoveries makes it easier to get complacent. Yet, historical patterns suggest this isn't the time to ignore risk. It's easy to take on more risk after enjoying strong returns. But this can be dangerous—history doesn’t repeat, but it often rhymes. Let’s talk portfolio risk; risk can = rewards; but at what price? Let’s take a humble breath. Recall the math and logic of portfolio losses. Bigger portfolio risks require a higher pain tolerance. Large portfolio losses are hard to recover from. If a $100,000 portfolio loses 20%, it drops to $80,000. To get back to even requires a 25% return on your $80,000.  It’s easy to take on more and more risk when we are being rewarded. But many experienced retirees know, “easy come, easy go.”

LPL Research Presents 2025 Midyear Outlook

By Peter Mullin • October 8, 2025
We're pleased to offer 2025 Midyear Outlook: Pragmatic Optimism, Measured Expectations, providing a comprehensive recap of the economy and market to date, plus a forecast through year-end.

Unparalleled Support For Your Financial Future

September 18, 2025

Independent Power Producers in an Electricity Bull Market

June 9, 2025
Thomas Shipp | Head of Equity Research Last Updated: June 05, 2025 Rising Utility: Independent Power Producers in an Electricity Bull Market The energy landscape, and particularly the market for electricity, is evolving rapidly. Electricity demand and energy infrastructure spending are expected to continue growing over the coming years. Several catalysts have been cited for this growth — grid modernization to support renewable energy, electric vehicle (EV) adoption, and increased electrification broadly. However, the market didn’t credit utility stocks for these supposed growth drivers and only became interested when artificial intelligence (AI) was part of the story. In today’s blog, we discuss how AI-driven power demand, and the associated hyperscaler capital expenditures cycle, ultimately brought investor focus to the utility stocks purported to benefit most: Independent Power Producers (IPPs). These companies, including Constellation Energy (CEG), Vistra Corp (VST), and NRG Energy (NRG), own and operate power generation facilities. Unlike traditional utilities, IPPs operate in competitive markets, selling electricity directly to retail and wholesale customers. The Data Center Connection Much investor excitement around IPPs comes from the growth of power-hungry data centers, driven by continued investment in AI from cash-rich cloud computing hyperscalers, such as Amazon Web Services (AMZN), Microsoft Azure (MSFT), and Google Cloud Platform (GOOG/L). Technology companies beyond the cloud hyperscalers, such as OpenAI (privately held) and Meta Platforms (META), are also driving data center demand, and the requisite electricity, as they seek to build their own tech infrastructure, further reversing the trend of “asset-light” capital allocation policies seen in mega cap tech over the last decade. META announced a long-term power deal with CEG just this week. Data centers require substantial amounts of reliable “always-on” power, and thus, suppliers of said power provide a highly valuable raw input for the latest AI model or application. Let’s explore longer term U.S. power demand forecasts to provide a contextual backdrop before analyzing the potential advantages held by IPPs. Growing Demand for Power Supports IPPs’ Strengths Demand for electricity is on the rise, and the trend is expected to continue for the foreseeable future. According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), U.S. electricity consumption is forecasted to increase in 2025 and 2026, surpassing the all-time high reached in 2024. This growth is largely driven by the commercial and industrial (C&I) sectors, including data centers and manufacturing establishments. Additionally, a report by industry consultant ICF International (ICFI) suggests that U.S. electricity demand is expected to grow by 25% by 2030 and 78% by 2050 . Market consensus believes IPPs are among the best positioned to capitalize on this growing electricity demand. The smattering of long-term power supply contracts between technology companies and IPPs, as well as the increased investment from the IPPs themselves, supports this thesis. This can be attributed to several factors: Increased Capacity. IPPs are investing heavily in expanding their generation capacity by reviving/extending existing nuclear power plants and purchasing natural gas power plants (see below on IPP Growth Strategies). Market Dynamics. The competitive nature of the IPP market drives efficiency. Companies that can produce electricity at lower costs and with higher reliability are rewarded with better market positions and potentially lucrative long-term contracts. Policy Support. U.S. industrial policies are providing incentives to promote energy infrastructure investment, such as nuclear production tax credits. Investor Confidence. The combination of growing demand, innovative and flexible capacity expansion, and supportive federal policies and regulations has led to increased investor confidence. As a result, the stocks of IPPs have seen impressive returns, which in turn have allowed IPPs to leverage elevated equity values for growth investments. IPP Growth Strategies in Power Generation Portfolio Large public IPPs have pursued mergers and acquisitions (M&A) this year to enhance their power generation portfolios and capitalize on market opportunities. Below, we outline three deals from this year to demonstrate how the IPP flexible business model (and elevated equity valuations) supports capturing increased electricity demand. Constellation Energy Group (CEG). In January, CEG agreed to acquire privately-held Calpine for $29.1 billion (inclusive of assuming $12.7 billion in Calpine’s debt), valuing the equity at $16.4 billion. CEG is funding the deal with ~$11.9 billion in stock (issuing 50 million shares, or ~13.1% of post-issuance total shares outstanding) and $4.5 billion in cash. After netting out cash generation at Calpine during 2025 (deal expected to close at end of 2025), the total enterprise value consideration is expected to be $26.6 billion, which the companies estimate is 7.9x 2026 estimated EBITDA. The Calpine deal will make CEG the largest power producer in the U.S., adding 26gigawatts (GW) of gas-fired turbine power generation and 1.5GW of geothermal/renewables to its existing 33GW power generation (two-thirds of which is nuclear — CEG possesses the largest nuclear generation fleet). Vistra (VST). In May, VST announced they would acquire natural gas assets from Lotus Infrastructure Partners for $1.9 billion, which represents a 7x 2026 adjusted EBITDA multiple. The deal is expected to close in late 2025 or early 2026. This natural gas deal quickly added 2.6GW of capacity, representing a 6.5% boost to VST’s capabilities. This capacity was added at a cost of ~$743/kilowatt (kW) which is two-thirds cheaper than the estimated $2,000/kW price of building, with the added benefit of faster integration. NRG Energy (NRG). In May, NRG agreed to acquire 13 GW of gas generation from LS Power for a total enterprise value of ~$12 billion at a 7.5x 2026 enterprise value (EV)/EBITDA multiple. The equity value of ~$9 billion is being funded using two-thirds cash on hand and one-third stock. The deal is expected to close in early 2026, and the company noted that the acquisition would double NRG’s generation capacity. Each of these deals followed similar growth strategies focused on natural gas generation. These deals, done at approximately 7–8x EBITDA, are currently cheaper and faster than building new facilities.; GE Vernova (GEV), a leading manufacturer of gas-fired turbines, recently said that orders placed today will not be delivered until 2028. Valuation Insights Since it was spun off from Exelon Corp (EXC) in January 2022, CEG has traded at an average 35%valuation premium to the peer group average. This premium can be attributed to its better credit profile, larger size, geographic mix, and carbon-free portfolio. VST has historically traded around the peer group average, and NRG has traded at a discount. NRG’s discount to peers could be attributed to its smaller size and less direct “pure-play data center/AI” thematic, which has only recently started to be discounted by the market, as the deal with LS Power not only expands NRG’s total generation capacity, but also significantly diversifies its geographic footprint. IPP Valuations: Market Multiples Show CEG’s Premium, NRG’s Re-Rating
More Posts

Articles and Assets

Your Prosperity Puzzle: Solved
What direction are you taking with your debts, income and assets?

What are your Priorities?

Schedule an Appointment

Well it’s the end of the year. I just searched on Google for “market outlook 2018.” I came up with a little over 58-million “results.”

So should you be investing in stocks in 2018? The quick answer: It’s likely a prudent part of your portfolio. But it depends on your circumstances, right?

It’s apparently popular to throw your hat in the ring.

A mantra that you hear among disciplined professionals is to “stay the course.”

Then you hear “sell high, buy low.”

Who’s right?

The relief of a disciplined strategy is that it can be tailored to you. And tailor we think you should.

Yes, it’s possible that an investor may not utilize stocks in their portfolio at all. Or you may decide to go “all in” with a diversified stock portfolio.

(Side effects from tailoring a strategy may include increased confidence & persistence, apathy toward daily market reports, and increased focus on what really matters.)

Let’s begin with the “Why” of investing for you. Then you can request 15-minutes on the phone discuss your “how.”

So “Why Should You Invest”

Life changes and our “why” of investing ought to transform with life. Some invest for sport  – they like the risk/reward of investing – they’re in it for the thrill. I don’t hang with this crowd.

Most of us ought to invest for things we want. Our money & our goals are serious. By investing in a diversified portfolio we can pursue things we want.

1. Living A Comfortable Retirement: Retirement is a noun. It’s up to you to really design and live a retirement that reflects you.

2. Purchasing a Home: Home is a place to live. It can take a down payment.

3. Passing an Inheritance on to Family:

4. Student Loan Shield: This idea is important for many Millennial graduates. Student loans can dominate your budget. But instead of accelerating those payments, what if you paid your required payments, and then invested the additional money that you were going to pay against your loan balance?

5. Emergency Reserves: You probably have read that it’s prudent to keep a relative healthy amount of cash in your checking/savings. Once you’ve achieved that, then you can consider investing additional funds. Go a step further and consider a non-retirement account for you and your house. You can spend this on cars, vacations or use it just as described in #4.

The Dow Jones has seen positive results, so far, in 2017. It’s unusual and sort of uncomfortable as the independent financial advisor. Why is it uncomfortable?

What would sting & linger longer? Finding $20 in the parking lot? Or finding a $20 parking fine on your windshield?

We’ve been finding a lot of metaphorical “$20’s” (i.e. “positive results”) in our portfolios this year. So the second we find a parking fine (or a few in a row) we’ll be sure to ask if stocks are still the right place to park our money.

Complacency can work against us, Dear Clients. Just keep recalling your long-haul strategy and your “why” of investing.

***

Peter Mullin is an independent financial advisor registered through LPL Financial. He lives in Rogers, MN with his family. He was born and raised in St. Cloud, MN. Mullin Wealth Management is located in Waite Park, MN.

The opinions voiced in this material are for general information only and are not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual.

Investing involves risk including loss of principal.

There is no guarantee that a diversified portfolio will enhance overall returns or outperform a non-diversified portfolio. Diversification does not protect against market risk.

All performance referenced is historical and is no guarantee of future results.

All indices are unmanaged and may not be invested into directly. No strategy assures success or protects against loss.

 

Schedule an Appointment